I used to take distance learning at face value. I never
thought about what goes into it in order to create a learning experience that’s
available to people wherever convenient for them. I searched for a formal
definition of distance learning, and this is what I found: “a method of
studying in which lectures are broadcast or classes are conducted by
correspondence or over the Internet, without the student's needing to attend a
school or college. Also called distance education.” I agree with this
very basic definition of the phrase, but what stuck out most to me is that the
definition clearly states that it can also be called distance education.
After reading through this week’s discussion posts,
Marina reminded me that in a previous class we talked about the difference
between learning and education. After some reflection, I feel that distance
learning cannot be called distance education. Learning can take place anywhere
(reading a book, watching television, listening to a lecture, etc), but
education is something that the learner wants. The learner must be invested in
his or her own education; they usually take it upon themselves to facilitate
knowledge.
I believe a person’s view on what distance learning is
can be impacted by many different factors. As an undergraduate student I saw it
as something that allowed me to complete classes without actually sitting in class (and, honestly, still see it
that way on occasion). I had no technical knowledge of what distance learning
was – to me, it involved a computer, a textbook, and an Internet connection. As
I’ve matured (in general and because of work experience), I’ve grown to have a
better understanding of what distance learning is. Or, maybe I should say I’ve
grown to learn a new, expanded definition. Since beginning a job where I work
with a team of distance learning professionals, I’ve come to appreciate the
amount of work that happens before a student can access a module online.
I did used to believe that distance learning was as
simple as listening to lectures or completing assignments in the comfort of my
own home (or dorm room), but after gaining more insight and studying this
program, I realize it’s more than that. Distance learning is an instructor taking
the time to put together a well informed lesson, it’s a student wanting to read
the content so that they do well on the quiz, and it’s a new way of promoting
topics to those who ordinarily may not have access to a classroom training.
Distance learning is constantly evolving. There will
always be new, better ways to do something, and views will always change. Some
people in the field might be of “old school” beliefs, which can lead to some
pushback on revising delivery methods, while others in the field are fresh out
of school with brand new ideas. These people are the innovators – without them,
the field of instructional design and technology would never move forward. If
we allow more of these types of people to come in and make improvements and try
new things, the field can only improve. Some new ideas may fail, but we can
learn from our mistakes and advance the field even more. When I imagine my
future in instructional design and specifically distance learning, I see more
use of technology, more of a sense of community, less laziness on the part of
instructors, and a more effective way of delivering lessons to students who are
actually interested in their education.
Moller, L.,
Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education:
Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2:
Higher education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66-70.
Gayle, enjoyed your mindmap and post. I agree with your vision that students will be in charge of their own education and will facilitate or customize their own learning objectives, or perhaps select from options that best suit them when looking at evaluation or path of learning.
ReplyDelete